|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 922/12/2010-CX, Dated: 18/05/2010 | |
|---|---|
|
Central Excise Officers
|
Power of adjudication
(Amount of duty involved)
|
|
Superintendents
|
Upto Rs. 1 Lakh
(excluding cases involving determination of rate of duty or valuation and cases involving extended period of limitation)
|
II. Consequently, the monetary limits of adjudication for the Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner would stand revised/amended in the said tables as follows:
|
Central Excise Officers
|
Power of adjudication
(Amount of duty involved)
|
|
Deputy/Assistant Commissioners
|
Upto Rs. 5 Lakh (except the cases where Superintendents are empowered to adjudicate).
|
III. After Para 4 of the said Circular, a new Para 4A shall be inserted as given below:
“4A Regarding the power of adjudication of cases given to Superintendents, the following aspects are clarified:
I. They would be eligible to decide cases involving duty and/or CENVAT credit upto Rs. 1 Lakh in individual SCNs.
II. They would not be eligible to decide cases which involve excisability of a product, classification, eligibility of exemption, valuation and cases involving suppression of facts, fraud etc..
III. They would be eligible to decide cases involving wrong availment of CENVAT credit upto a monetary limit of upto Rs. 1 Lakh.
IV. They would be eligible to decide Show Cause Notice proposing only imposition of penalty under Rule 26 and 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or Rule 15 and 15A of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.”
2. The jurisdictional Commissioners of Central Excise may redistribute the pending cases in the Commissionerate based on the above factors. It is further clarified that notwithstanding this revision, in all cases, where the personal hearing has already been completed, orders will be passed by the officer before whom the hearing has been held. Such orders should normally be issued within a month of the date of completion of the personal hearing.
3. It may also be noted that the age-wise pendency of cases as shown in MTR would be reflected based on the date of issuance of Show Cause Notice, and not on the basis of transfer of cases to the new Adjudicating Authority. The jurisdictional Commissioners should ensure that the work regarding re-allocation of pending cases, issuance of corrigendum to the Show Cause Notices, transfer of relevant files and records, etc., should be completed within a month. A compliance report in this regard should be sent by the Commissioner to the zonal Chief Commissioner, who in turn, should submit a report to the Board by 1.6.2010, certifying that all the work regarding re-allocation of cases has been completed.
4. Field formations and trade may be informed suitably.
5. Receipt of the Circular may please be acknowledged.
6. Hindi version will follow.
( Sushil Solanki )
Commissioner (CX)
|
|||
|
|||
|